Jan 12, No 1, Sec 1
Jan 12, No 1, Sec 2
Mar 12, No 1, Sec 1
Mar 12, No 1, Sec 2
June 12, No 1, Sec 1
June 12, No 1, Sec 2
Sep 12, No 1, Sec 1
Sep 12, No 1, Sec 2
Dec 2012, No 1, Sec 1
Dec 2012, No 1, Sec 2

The Stress Doc Letter
Cybernotes from the Online Psyumorist (tm)

Shrink Rap II:

Two Communicational Tools Providing Perspective, Patience and Presence:
Message and Mantra for Transforming Reaction into Response

Increasingly, research is showing a direct correlation between employee productivity, business profitability, and the degree to which employees feel their employers are concerned about their personal and professional welfare.  (See The 2010 AMA Handbook of Leadership.)  For example, in the groundbreaking work, First Break All the Rules:  What the Greatest Managers Do Differently (Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman) five of the twelve core elements (listed in their order of importance) “needed to attract, focus and keep the most talented employees” involve feedback, recognition and relationship building:

4.  In the last seven days, have I received recognition or praise for doing good work?

5.  Does my supervisor, or someone at work, seem to care about me as a person?

6.  Is there someone at work who encourages my development?

7.  At work, do my opinions seem to count?

11. In the last six months, has someone at work talked to me about my progress?

Clearly, to both motivate and help people positively relate, interpersonal communication must reflect such critical factors as awareness, clarity, empathy, mutuality and timeliness.  And in today’s hyper-speed digital (HSD) world, with info scan increasingly trumping attention span, people want simple and easy to apply, yet also savvy and strategic tools for bridging the communicational divide.  In addition, honest, open and emotional connection, not just simply passing along information, are especially critical when parties are grappling with psychologically charged issues related to loss, change and uncertainty and/or conflict-laden cultural climates, e.g., employees who have gone through major reorg or RIF (Reduction in Force) and are wondering about if not waiting for the next “frightsizing” axe to fall.

With this in mind, as a writer and speaker, increasingly I provide an audience with concise psychological and communication concepts and tools – from aphorisms and acronyms to pithy poetic pearls – with a verbal (and sometimes visual-theatrical) design that, hopefully, make them easy to use and hard to forget.  In an increasingly “do more with less,” hyperactive-distracted-overextended and over-cluttered mind-field, the ability to create “sententious” messages, messages “full of significance (and style) and expressed tersely” becomes a vital art form.

Two Communicational Tools Providing Perspective, Patience and Presence

For example, try these two communicational techniques to trump a knee-jerk “reaction” with a firm yet flexibly focused “response”:

1. Differentiate Blaming “You” vs. Responsible “I” Messages. 
“You’re always late,” “What’s your problem?” or “You made us look bad.”  “You” messages not only assign blame or are judgmental and often global (e.g., “You never”), but they deny any responsibility on the part of the person making those “acc-you-sations.”  (And a chronic “acc-you-ser” risks becoming a blameaholic!)  Actually, even worse, these accusing “You”s often facilitate a transfusion of power: the “acc-you-ser” is increasingly becoming a puppet and is enabling the so-called antagonist to pull all the strings.

So, instead of “You’re making me mad” or “It’s your fault,” how about, “I don’t like what’s going on between us.  Here’s what I don’t appreciate (or) this is what has me frustrated, concerned, uncomfortable, etc.”  Then specifically, clearly and concisely state your “I”-message concern, e.g., “I prefer being asked or questioned about my reasons for doing XYZ rather than being confronted by assumptions.  I need for us to talk about what’s going on!”

The shift from blaming or judging involves: a) asserting one’s own beliefs and perspective and, when necessary, firmly yet respectfully setting limits on the use of “You”-message fault-finding, b) setting boundaries on a party not respecting one’s physical or psychological space, c) evolving a perspective that is less focused on the other person’s “faults” (that is, an intrapersonal position) and more concerned with developing an interpersonal, “How are we together generating this situation and what can we do about it?” problem-solving approach, and d) acknowledging and taking responsibility for one’s actions and feelings by using “I”-messages, including stating likes and dislikes, and concerns and irritations.

Such an emotional-communicational shift means being authentically “self”-centered in contrast to being narcissistically ego-driven.  Remember, a healthy “I”-communicator strives for real and respectful, responsible and responsive give and take between the parties.  (Email for my article “The Four “R”s of PRO Relating.”)  The narcissist invariably sees life through a “black or white” or a “right or wrong” lens, though these may even have rose-colored tinting.  This personality inevitably needs to be in a “one-up” or “in control” position.  And when the surprisingly sensitive narcissist feels his or her hurt is triggered by an alleged provocateur, then launching the old blamethrower is excusable, if not perfectly justified.

Quickly Bringing the Impact of “You” vs “I” to Life

Of course, a “blameholic” can consciously or not try to disguise weakness or immaturity with a Mr. Bluster mask and manner.  Still, the difference between affirming “I” responses and offensively defensive “You” reactions is transparent.  For example, imagine you are in an argument, perhaps over politics or whether a movie was worth seeing, and the other party suddenly tires of the logical back and forth.  Consider the impact of each of these two-word declarations.  Can you hear and feel the difference between “You’re wrong” (said with a judgmental tone) as compared to “I disagree” (declared with energy and conviction; or perhaps with a tad more tact, “I see it differently”)?

The consistent group facial expressions (and occasional gasps) when an audience member helps me act out this contrasting two-word scenario reveals the verbal and emotional impact.  And quick analysis is illuminating.  “You’re wrong” no longer is dealing with the specific issue but is actually dismissive of the other individual.  In contrast, “I disagree” is predicated on the other’s position or points of argument, that is, the “I”-response is respectfully problem-focused while a “You”-reaction is often judgmental, win-lose, and personality-driven.

Finally, I believe a reactive “You” message tends to be one-sided, driven by “right or wrong” presumptions:  “all head” (e.g., a coldly intellectual remark or a rejoinder dripping with scarcasm, e.g., “I’m just sure you could not have done anything else?”) or “all heart” (e.g., a wounded or weepy, “feel sorry for me,” outburst or lament).  In contrast, a “responsive” “I”-message combines both “head and heart.”  An “I” perspective typically attempts to perceive, understand and integrate multiple perspectives, that is, tries to construct a meaningful assessment of one’s own along with the other’s deeds, needs and intentions.  And next is another memorable technique for achieving this integration.

2. Consider a “Reflective and Responsive” Mantra. 
The standard advice when you’ve “had it up to here” with someone and want to verbally explode or simply lash out is, of course, “Count to ten.”  And while I see some merit, for me the cautionary counsel falls a bit short.  In the heat of battle, if thrown off guard, I can just imagine myself methodically counting, “1-2-3-4,” then suddenly shifting gears, flying through 5 through 9, and at “10” blurting out, “You bozo!”  (Even the Stress Doc is susceptible to that “You”-ruption every once in a while; though the words of French novelist Andre Gide from his book, The Immoralist, often helps me silently, if not serenely, place people and positions in perspective:  One must allow others to be right; it consoles them for not being anything else!)

Actually, to be less reactive, all you need is some of those well-developed multi-tasking skills to transform the old saw into a new aphorism.  (As an aside, while the younger generation is particularly adept at multi-tasking, I suspect folks of any age who primarily hyper-speed through life may have some initial difficulty being personally reflective and psychosocially attentive.)  Anyway…my poetic mantra:  Count to ten and check within.  That is, while you are counting (and centering yourself or trying to calm) down, ask one or more of these questions, which may also slow the countdown:  “What am I feeling right now?”  Am I attributing all my hurt or anger to “the other”; am I about to vent with a blaming “You”?  Is it possible that some of my outrage reveals that my own “hot button” or emotional baggage issues have been pushed, triggered or stirred?  Am I confronting my” Intimate FOE:  Fear of Exposure?”

Here’s an example of a self-inventory process, though, admittedly, one several years in the making.  A heated exchange followed by quiet discussion enabled my partner to finally realize that my behavior was not equivalent to the immature actions of her ex; my actions were not really firing up her emotional cauldron.  It was her own low boiling point, worn down by an erosive and divisive marriage, helping to trigger her impatience and anger with her present partner.  (Though, of course, I certainly bring some of my own stuff to our intimate interaction.)  The real “hot button” was her self-regret, shame and rage for not being strong enough to leave sooner a mostly dysfunctional “thirty year” relationship.  And when this “separation/being on my own” fear constricted her options, there were some irreparable consequences for the children, the adults, and the family as a whole.  However, having the courage to face your sadness and remorse softens the anger and rage that otherwise turns inward and/or gets acted out onto others.  And this deeper awareness should help a dyad’s interaction be less defensive and reactive.

After completing this rapid internal audit, if still confused or frustrated while in the heat of battle, then build upon the mantra: Count to ten and check within…when in doubt, check without!  Alas, my poetic addition may be a tad ambiguous. So let’s clarify some possible interpretations of check without:

a) check outside yourself; ask the other to clarify his or her message, e.g., “I’m not clear about what I’m hearing”;

b) check or set limits on a hostile communicator, e.g., “I don’t mind feedback, even critical feedback, but hostility and condescension are not acceptable!  Let’s try again,”

c) check in with an open mind, that is, without bias, making every effort to consciously suspend your assumptions and prejudgments; e.g., “I must admit I’m not neutral in this matter, but I will attempt to listen with an open and objective mind.”

If issues remain troubling upon “checking within and without,” remember, you may momentarily retreat yet still be palpably real and paradoxically present.  You may checkout to check in:  “I’m way angry right now, and don’t want to put my foot in my mouth (or your butt).  I’m not running out; I’m taking a timeout.  I want to think about this, and I will get back to you first thing in the morning.  From my perspective, we are not finished.”  Clearly, strategic-reflective retreating is not giving up but stepping back in order to cool down, lick wounds, reevaluate, perhaps talk with a “stress buddy,” integrate head and heart, gain new perspective and strategy, and then responsibly reengage.  (Of course, there are times, especially in the instance of child abuse, when an aggressor-predator-enabler has clearly earned “You”-focused confrontation, condemnation and, if warranted, incarceration.  For example, see Penn State’s and Syracuse University’s potential criminal scandals and cover-ups.)

Hopefully, you now have two new, quick application tools for bridging the communication divide and for helping all parties…Practice Safe Stress!

 Main Essay: 

Taking Kaleidoscopic AIM:  Designing a Matrix for “Cognitive-Communication” Consciousness

The article, “Taking Kaleidoscopic AIM:  Designing a Matrix for “Cognitive-Communication” Consciousness,” provides a matrix for "Cognitive-Communication Consciousness." Because it involves a matrix, I will need to attach the entire article.  At this point, I have just sketched the model; I have not explained it in detail. My goal is to develop a model that will help a communicator be better prepared as a thinker and message developer-deliverer to, “Ready…Aim…Fire!” not “Ready…Fire…Aim!”  Despite being in the gestation phase, I hope it may pique your curiosity. As always, I would love to hear any impressions and ideas.

P.S.  Here’s some of my motive for writing this article:  In our “Hyper-Speed Digital” (HSD) world, the medium is not just shaping the message but also the messenger, along with the mentality of over messaged-stimulated masses.  One obvious example:  attention span appears to be shrinking across the age spectrum.  However, I’m also noticing overdrive speech patterns, especially for the generations who have grown up with the Internet and Social Media (that is, Internet Natives in contrast to us older Generational Slugs, actually, Internet Immigrants, according to Nick Bolton technology blogger for the New York Times and author of I Live in the Future & Here’s How It Works, 2010).  People just seem to talk faster, (also louder), as if they are racing to get their words in (or heard) before the other party’s ever restless radar is distracted elsewhere or simply tunes out.  (See attachment for entire article.)


In our “Hyper-Speed Digital” (HSD) world, the medium is not just shaping the message but also the messenger, along with the mentality of over messaged-stimulated masses.  One obvious example:  attention span appears to be shrinking across the age spectrum.  However, I’m also noticing overdrive speech patterns, especially for the generations who have grown up with the Internet and Social Media (that is, Internet Natives in contrast to us older Generational Slugs, actually, Internet Immigrants, according to Nick Bolton technology blogger for the New York Times and author of I Live in the Future & Here’s How It Works, 2010).  People just seem to talk faster, (also louder), as if they are racing to get their words in (or heard) before the other party’s ever restless radar is distracted elsewhere or simply tunes out. (Or perhaps it’s just my hearing that’s slowing as, in my sixth decade, I more consciously ebb and flow between moving smartly and purposefully as per my foundational New York/East Coast mode and mentally meandering “out of the creative closet” and into my “American in Cajun Paris,” “N’Awlins/Big Easy” mode.)

In addition to the speech rate, I’m also aware of multi-generational hyper-tendencies – individuals frequently blurting out the first thing that comes up.  I was going to say “comes to mind,” but I think certain cerebral circuits are being bypassed:  people are simply “shooting from the lip.”   More and more, especially when engaged in intense discussion or disagreement, my sense is that people are reflexively following their own silent and internal convoluted command:  Ready…Fire…Aim!  There’s too much electronic, scattershot, “shoot first, ask questions later” messaging.  Once feeling provoked or disrespected, you’re gunning for or putting down perceived antagonists or competitors; inflating one’s self-importance at another’s expense may or not be premeditated.  For example, while you expect some testiness (and testosterone) in a Presidential Primary Debate, Mitt Romney’s “$10,000 bet/challenge” in reaction to Rick Perry’s repeated criticism, instantly becomes a “shoot from the lip” classic.


Children's Hospital -- Wisconsin

[Two-hour Keynote on "Managing Stress/Burnout and Building Team Morale," for 150 allied health professionals]

Dec 21, 2011

The feedback I received from the several that I spoke with was that they all received good and useful information for their daily work on their unit in the hospital.  People were positive and upbeat as they left the conference, as it brought people together on common ground of the feelings of burnout.  This is a topic that is the "elephant in the room" and it was helpful to be reminded that the "elephant" needs attention and to be tamed on a regular basis.

The conference helped me on a personal level, by both identifying my own feelings of burnout, and freeing me up to explore all the possibilities for dealing with that burnout.  I have since had conversations about burnout, after sharing my own feelings, that have been helpful for myself and others.  Sometimes it just helps to know "it comes with the territory" for the job fields that we have chosen and that as long as we can survive it, burnout can be energizing as well as draining!

Here's a sample testimonial:

"Mark was an engaging speaker who quickly connected with a diverse group. He shared relevant information in a humorous way. Mark provided a worthwhile presentation that was helpful and reminded us about keeping workplace stress in proper perspective."

And here is one from me:

"Mark was a great choice for a speaker at our recent conference -- he was engaging, energetic and interactive. At a time when we are facing big change on an ongoing basis, Mark's program proved to be timely and directly applicable to the challenges in our current climate."

Emily Widen
Conference/Student Coordinator
Educational Services
Children's Hospital & Health System



(Half-day "Stress Management, Communications and Team Building Program" for 15 Managers/Attorneys)

Dec. 20, 2011

I would like to commend Mr. Mark Gorkin on the wonderful seminar that he imparted to the City Attorney’s office on Stress Management.  After his presentation, people were commenting on how much fun it was.

One of the most valuable parts of the seminar were the “exercises.”  One of them reminded me that in times of conflict you have a choice not to pull the rope in the opposite way figuratively speaking.

His sense of humor helped to make light out some of our most difficult daily challenges.

Thanks for an excellent presentation!

Best wishes,

Maria Elia Moya Posas
Maria Elia Moya Posas, Legal Administrator
1700 Convention Center Drive, Fourth Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139

Readers' Submissions:

Subj:  Perks of reaching 50 or 60 and heading towards 70 or beyond!
From:  D Pearson

1. Kidnappers are not very interested in you.

2. In a hostage situation, you are likely to be released first.

3. No one expects you to run -- anywhere.

4. People call at 9 PM (or 9 AM) and ask, 'Did I wake you?'

5. People no longer view you as a hypochondriac.

6. There is nothing left to learn the hard way.

7. Things you buy now won't wear out.

8. You can eat Supper at 4 PM.

9. You can live without sex, but not your glasses.

10. You get into heated arguments about pension plans.

11. You no longer think of speed limits as a challenge.

12. You quit trying to hold your stomach in no matter who walks into the room.

13. You sing along with elevator music.

14. Your eyes won't get much worse.

15. Your investment in health insurance is finally beginning to pay off.

16. Your joints are more accurate meteorologists than the national weather service.

17. Your secrets are safe with your friends because they can't remember them either.

18. Your supply of brain cells is finally down to a manageable size.

19. You can't remember who sent you this list.

And you notice these are all in big print for your convenience.

Forward this to everyone you can remember right now!


Never, NEVER, NEVER, Under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill, and a laxative on the same night!

"Good friends are like stars...You don't always see them, but you know they are always there."


Subject:  When Insults Had Class

There was a verbal exchange between Churchill & Lady Astor:
She said, "If you were my husband I'd poison your tea."
He said, "If you were my wife, I'd drink it."

A Member of Parliament to Disraeli: "Sir, you will either die on the gallows or of some unspeakable disease."
"That depends, Sir," said Disraeli, "whether I embrace your policies or your mistress." 

"He had delusions of adequacy." - Walter Kerr 

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." - Winston Churchill 

"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."
Clarence Darrow 

"He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary." - William Faulkner (about Ernest Hemingway). 

"Thank you for sending me a copy of your book; I'll waste no time reading it."
- Moses Hadas 

"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain 

"He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends.." - Oscar Wilde 

"I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend.... if you have one." - George Bernard Shaw to Winston Churchill
"Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second... if there is one." - Winston Churchill, in response. 

"I feel so miserable without you; it's almost like having you here." - Stephen Bishop 

"He is a self-made man and worships his creator." - John Bright 

"I've just learned about his illness. Let's hope it's nothing trivial." - Irvin S. Cobb 

"He is not only dull himself; he is the cause of dullness in others." - Samuel Johnson. 

"He is simply a shiver looking for a spine to run up." - Paul Keating 

"In order to avoid being called a flirt, she always yielded easily." - Charles, Count Talleyrand 

"Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it?" - Mark Twain 

"His mother should have thrown him away and kept the stork." - Mae West. 

"Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go." - Oscar Wilde 

"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts.. . for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) 

"He has Van Gogh's ear for music." - Billy Wilder 

"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it." - Groucho Marx



Mark Gorkin, MSW, LICSW, "The Stress Doc" ™, a Licensed Clinical Social Worker, is an acclaimed keynote & kickoff speaker, webinar presenter, as well as "Motivational Humorist & Team Communication Catalyst" known for his interactive, inspiring and FUN programs for both government agencies and major corporations. In addition, the "Doc" is a team building and organizational development consultant. He is providing "Stress and Communication, as well as Managing Change, Leadership and Team Building" programs for the 1st Cavalry Division and 13th Expeditionary Support Command, Ft. Hood, Texas and for Army Community Services and Family Advocacy Programs at Ft. Meade, MD and Ft. Belvoir, VA as well as Andrews Air Force Base/Behavioral Medicine Services. Mark has also rotated as a Military & Family Life Consultant (MFLC) at Ft. Campbell, KY. A former Stress and Violence Prevention Consultant for the US Postal Service, The Stress Doc is the author of Practice Safe Stress and of The Four Faces of Anger. See his award-winning, USA Today Online "HotSite" -- www.stressdoc.com -- called a "workplace resource" by National Public Radio (NPR). For more info on the Doc's "Practice Safe Stress" programs or to receive his free e-newsletter, email stressdoc@aol.com or call 301-875-2567.


(c)  Mark Gorkin  2012

Shrink Rap™ Productions